Skip to main content
Plantar FascitisProcedure

What this study is

The primary aim of this clinical experiment is to compare, in terms of pain relief measured using the 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (5-7), the clinical results of ultrasound-guided injection (USGI) versus anatomic topography-guided injection (ATGI) of corticosteroid for the treatment of proximal PF. Secondary aims will be to compare foot-related quality of life, as measured using the Foot Function Index (FFI)and the Bristol Foot Score (BFS), between the injection groups, and also to compare the pre-injection to late-term post-injection thickness of the plantar fascia as measured in the nested USGI group.

What's being tested

  • Local Steroid Injection into the plantar heel

    Intervention · PROCEDURE

    Injections consisting of 0.5 ml 0.25% bupivacaine plain, 0.5 ml dexamethasone phosphate, and 0.5 ml triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg/ml.

  • Ultrasound Guided Injection

    Intervention · PROCEDURE

    Execution of the USGI will employ an actual diagnostic US machine (Voluson E8 Expert, General Electric Company, Boston, MA) and a plantarmedial approach

  • Anatomical Guided injection

    Intervention · PROCEDURE

    Execution of the ATGI will employ a sham diagnostic US machine and a plantarmedial approach.

Study details

Official title
Randomized Clinical Study to Evaluate Ultrasound Guided Injection Therapy Versus Topographic Injection Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis
Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Conditions
Plantar Fascitis
Enrolling
62 people
Starts
2017-03-28
Est. completion
2026-10-31
Design
Double-blind, randomized, single group
Record
View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗